I went through sleeptradesmemes's plan for turning a 0.1 SOL account into 10 SOL on Axiom Pulse. What holds up is the order of the checks, not the target. He picks a story first, then reads who owns the supply, then decides whether the chart deserves a position. August 11, 2026 matters here, because the coin he used as his example was built around a date of August 12, so read it as a case study rather than a live idea.
What Axiom Pulse is in this plan
Axiom is a trading terminal for Solana memecoins that runs in a browser tab at axiom.trade. In the creator's framing, Pulse is where new memecoins surface before they pump, and the token page behind it is where the supply checks live. The plan leans on that split: Pulse for finding coins, the readouts for filtering them.
Because it all happens in a browser tab, check the address bar before you connect. Open axiom.trade from a bookmark, not from a link in a reply or a direct message. No trading site needs your seed phrase or private key to show you a chart, and whoever has either one owns the wallet.
Signing up happens at axiom.trade/@code20. That is this site's referral link, and the site may earn a share of the fees of people who join through it. If you have not made a wallet and connected it yet, the steps are in our Axiom setup guide.
Why the creator starts with narrative
Before any chart, the creator asks what story the coin is selling. His first step is finding a good narrative, because a coin with a story already spreading has buyers lined up before you arrive. He watches TikTok, X and Instagram for something going viral, and he prefers stories with a name and a date attached, since a countdown gives people a reason to buy before the clock runs out.
His example is Project Anchor, a conspiracy-flavoured story that gravity would disappear for seven seconds on August 12, 2026. He says he does not believe it. The belief of other people is the trade.
He also names the categories that get pushed hardest: anything tied to Trump or to Elon Musk, or any story that escapes crypto and shows up in ordinary conversation. Those names carry an audience, and an audience is what moves a memecoin.
I think the date matters more than the story. A narrative with a deadline has a shelf life built in, and the buyers who arrive for the deadline are the same people who leave once it passes. That does not make the trade wrong. It makes the exit part of the plan from the first minute. A story with no calendar can grind along for weeks, but it gives you no moment when the crowd is guaranteed to show up.
The argument assumes that attention arriving on a schedule turns into buying at a price you can sell into. That assumption is untested against a coin whose story fizzled. Treat the narrative screen as a way to find attention, not as a forecast.
The columns on a token page, and how he reads them
Once a coin passes the narrative screen, the next job is making sure you are not buying supply that one person can dump on you. Axiom shows a set of readouts beside the token, and the creator works through them in the same order each time.
| Readout | What it covers | How the creator reads it |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holders | Share of supply held by the ten largest wallets | 23.08% on the example coin, treated as bearish |
| Pro traders to holders | Ratio of professional traders to ordinary holders | Good when pro traders are at least half |
| Insiders | Wallets sent supply before trading began | Called a bad reading when it showed zero buys and a 4k profit |
| Bundlers | One person buying across many wallets | Bearish, and checked again on bubble maps |
| Dev holding | Supply the developer still holds | Bearish on a hype narrative |
| Snipers | Wallets that bought in the first seconds | One of the regular checks before entry |
| DEX paid | Whether someone paid to list the coin on DEX Screener | Bullish, because it puts the coin in front of viewers |
The top 10 holders figure gets most of his attention. On the Project Anchor token the ten largest wallets held 23.08% of supply, and the panel lists each wallet with its dollar value. If those ten decided to sell, he says, they could bring the price down a substantial amount. On a token this small, 23.08% of supply is enough to take the chart apart. A quarter of supply hitting the book at once needs a quarter of supply's worth of buyers to absorb it, and a 6k market cap does not have them.
The pro trader ratio is the counterweight. He says: "If the pro traders is at least half of this, that's a good sign." Wallets with a trading record are less likely to be one person in disguise, so a holder base with plenty of them looks more like an open market. If any readout comes up red, he treats it as bearish and moves on.
Insiders gave the weakest reading in his own example. The column showed zero buys against a 4k profit, which he calls incorrect, and he sets it aside rather than drawing a conclusion from it. I would do the same. A column that misfires in the obvious direction tells you nothing until you know why.
Snipers are the wallets that bought the second the coin launched. They hold cheap supply, so their presence tells you who is first in line to sell into your entry. Dev holding works the same way. A developer still holding a story-driven coin can sell at any moment, and the creator treats that as a reason to stay out however good the narrative looks.
DEX paid is the one positive marker. Someone pays either 250 or 299, he says one of the two, to push the coin, and a paid listing puts it on the front page of DEX Screener for a while. He calls DEX Screener the biggest platform for viewing coins across Ethereum, Solana, BSC and other chains, so a paid spot is exposure to people browsing for something to buy. He counts it as bullish too when the community says a payment is coming before it lands. Seeing the fee already paid is a different signal from planning to pay it yourself, and only the first one is on the page when you arrive.
How a bundle check works in practice
A bundle is one person buying across several wallets so that it looks like several buyers. His example: spend 10k across ten wallets and the holder list shows ten separate people. One hand still controls the supply, and it can leave in one decision.
Axiom links out to bubble map tools, and he names InsightX, Faster100x and Bubblemaps.io, saying he usually checks all three. Each circle is a wallet, and circles that cluster show wallets that moved together or were funded from the same place.
On the Project Anchor token the numbers were ugly. The token page reported 43.11% of supply bundled. One bubble map showed a 14% cluster of connected wallets, a 0.27% cluster, and a 56% cluster that he guessed was the liquidity pool. He read the 43% and the 14% as very bearish, then checked the other tools and found more connected wallets.
Be careful with the largest cluster. A liquidity pool normally holds a big slice of a new token's supply, and a tool that counts the pool as a holder will inflate the bundled percentage. The number to act on is the connected cluster that is not the pool, which here was the 14% group. That is still enough supply to bury a token this size.
The token page figure is a prompt to look further. It said 43.11%, and the map showed where the supply actually sat. One tool tells you something is connected; the map tells you what.
Where the plan says to buy and sell
The worked example is a dip buy. He says he first looked at the coin around a 5k market cap, that it had fallen to about 2k at its low and then recovered to roughly 6k, and that a sale anywhere between 12k and 15k would have been a 250% move. The chart below shows the market caps he names.
His size example is one SOL, ten times the account in the title. That gap matters, because the percentages behave the same while the money does not. He calls a 250% gain on one SOL a very good amount; on the smaller stake the same percentage move is a tenth of the money.
The 250% is his figure for the move, and the entry is his memory of where he got in. Market cap is not the price you receive. In a book this thin your own sell pushes the price down as you exit, so the last buyer at 15k is not the average fill for everyone who sold on the way up. Treat the example as a way to think about the shape of a trade, not as a plan with a known return.
It does show why he waits for a dip. Buying a story that has already run means paying the people who arrived first. Buying after the first flush means the people who wanted out early have mostly gone.
PVP, vamps and cashback
A coin on a hot narrative rarely stays alone. While he was working the example, a second Project Anchor token appeared at roughly a 17k market cap, carrying the real image. He calls that PVP: two tokens fighting over the same buyers.
Cashback explains why the newcomer took the lead. On the newer coin a share of the trading fees goes back to the people trading it, and the first coin did not pay that, so the volume moved. He uses the word vamp for a coin overtaking another on the same story, and says the vamps are the part of memecoin trading he likes least.
Cashback is a subsidy paid in volume. It gives traders a reason to route their buying through one contract instead of the other, and volume is what makes a chart look alive. The narrative check on its own is not enough, then: two tickers can share one story, and the crowd can be in the one you did not buy.
His second tactic is to buy the original coin of a narrative. He searched the story, found a third Anchor token at about a 51k market cap and said he was not sure it was a real coin. The tactic assumes the market returns to the first coin once the fork cools. Sometimes it does. Sometimes the original is abandoned while the copy keeps the liquidity, and nothing tells you which case you are in before you buy.
What a small account can do, and what it can lose
A stake of 0.1 SOL has to grow a hundred times to reach 10 SOL. Ten trades that each return about 58% would get there, compounded, if none of them loses. One trade would need a hundredfold move on a single coin. Both routes assume you keep the whole stake at work, and that assumption is the one that breaks.
Run it the other way. A 50% loss leaves 0.05 SOL. A second one leaves 0.025, a third 0.0125. The tokens this method targets can fall that far in minutes, because the wallets the checks flag, the 23.08% in ten holders, the 14% cluster, the dev and the snipers, are exactly the wallets that sell first when a story turns.
Trading costs weigh more on a small position. Network fees, priority fees and slippage are charged per trade, so the account hands over a larger share of itself per trade than a one SOL account does. The video does not spell out what share of the stake goes into a single coin or what Axiom charges per trade, so check both before you size anything.
The creator's line is that "a couple SOL a day keeps the job away." That is the outcome he is aiming at, and a couple of SOL a day is twenty times the account in the title before you count any losses.
What I would check before relying on this
The coin pick is the least of it. Four checks decide whether this works.
- A narrative with a date works while the date is ahead of you and loses its engine right after, so plan the exit before the entry.
- Check the same token on more than one bubble map service, as the creator does, before trusting a bundle percentage. You want to know whether the big cluster is the pool or one person.
- If a copy with cashback is outrunning the original, you own the wrong ticker even when the story is right.
- If a sell would move the price, the position is too large for that token or the token is too small for the position.
Two numbers matter more than anything else on the page: the share of supply sitting in a handful of wallets, because that is what turns a bad day into a total loss, and the size of the account. A small stake can take a few losses and still exist, and that is the only reason the plan has a chance.
Filter settings are a separate subject, and I have left them where they belong, in our Axiom memecoin filters guide. Read that before you touch the settings, and start with an amount you can lose without changing your week.
